« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6
, Pages 504-506
, December 2006
Influence of NICE guidelines on removal of third molars in a region of the UK
References
- . The relationship between dental health and variations in the level of third molar removals experienced by populations. Community Dent Health. 1998;15:67–71
- . Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ. 1994;309:620–621
- . National third molar project: the initial report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:14–18
- . Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:33–35
- . Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal. Br Dent J. 1993;175:102–105
- . Indications for third molar surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:105–108
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: is it justified? University of York. 1998;3(2).
- National Institute, for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the removal of wisdom teeth. London: NICE; 2000 (technology appraisal guidance no.)
- . Impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series. BMJ. 2003;326:578
- . Dentists’ agreement on treatment of asymptomatic impacted third molar teeth: interview study. BMJ. 1997;315:1204
PII: S0266-4356(05)00328-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.10.011
© 2005 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6
, Pages 504-506
, December 2006
