British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 511-514 , December 2006

Assessment of the sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging

  • Figen Cizmeci Senel

      Affiliations

    • Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Trabzon, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • Serpil Duran

      Affiliations

    • Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
    • ,
  • Onur Icten

      Affiliations

    • Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
    • ,
  • Izlem Izbudak

      Affiliations

    • MEDMAR Imaging Center, Ankara, Turkey
    • ,
  • Fulya Cizmeci

      Affiliations

    • Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

,Accepted 17 February 2006.

References 

  1. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT, Bainton R. Assessment of sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:285–289
  2. Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Needham G, Renny NMP. Assessment of maxillary sinus volume for the sinus lift operation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:154–158
  3. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:1–18
  4. Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. The use of tomography for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997;26:206–213
  5. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Pre-surgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Implantol. 1996;22:147–153
  6. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52:210–216
  7. Wheeler SI, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six year clinical and histological study of sinus lift grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:26–34
  8. Nevins M, Melloing JT. Implant therapy. Clinical approaches and evidence of success. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1998;
  9. Yıldırım M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhof D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:23–33
  10. Jensen J, Sindet-Peterson S. Autogenousmandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:1277–1287
  11. Wetzel AC, Stich H, Caffesse RG. Bone apposition onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:155–163
  12. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJW, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21:204–209
  13. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:229–238
  14. Bolin A, Eliasson S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L. Radiographic examination of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:354–359
  15. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, Rhodes M. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33:555–597
  16. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for implant dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27:225–229
  17. Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Bainton R, Smith FW. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of a sinus lift operation using reoxidised cellulose (Surgicel) as graft material. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:526–530

PII: S0266-4356(06)00034-9

doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.02.004

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 511-514 , December 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution