British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 212-216 , April 2007

A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars

  • Hasan Garip

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, Department of OMFS, Marmara University, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Guzelbahce Buyuk Ciftlik Sk., No: 6 80200, Nisantasi, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel.: +90 53 5360 1020.
    • ,
  • Yavuz Gürkan

      Affiliations

    • Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli, Turkey
    • ,
  • Kamil Toker

      Affiliations

    • Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli, Turkey
    • ,
  • Kamil Göker

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, Department of OMFS, Marmara University, Turkey

,Accepted 8 June 2006.

References 

  1. Garip H, Abali O, Goker K, Gokturk U, Garip Y. Anxiety and extraction of third molars in Turkish patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:551–554
  2. Kucukyavuz Z, Cambazoglu M. Effects of low-dose midazolam with propofol in patient-controlled sedation (PCS) for apicectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:215–220
  3. Esen E, Üstün Y, Balcıoğlu O, Alparslan ZN. Evaluation of patient-controlled remifentanil application in third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:457–463
  4. Avramov MN, Smith I, White PF. Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:1283–1289
  5. Egan TD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil: an update in the year. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000;13:449–455
  6. Bell GW, Kelly PJ. A study of anxiety, and midazolam-induced amnesia in patients having lower third molar teeth extracted. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:596–602
  7. Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1346–1351
  8. Osborn TM, Sandler NA. The effects of preoperative anxiety on intravenous sedation. Anesth Prog. 2004;51:46–51
  9. Hong JY, Kang IS, Koong MK, et al. Preoperative anxiety and propofol requirement in conscious sedation for ovum retrieval. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18:863–868
  10. Sá Rêgo MM, White PF. What is new in monitored anesthesia care?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 1998;11:601–606
  11. Parworth LP, Frost DE, Zuniga JR, Bennett T. Propofol and fentanyl compared with midazolam and fentanyl during third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:447–454[Erratum in: J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:219]
  12. Oei-Lim VL, Kalkman CJ, Makkes PC, Ooms WG. Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:967–972
  13. Rodrigo MR, Fung SC. Comparison of two techniques of patient-controlled sedation with midazolam. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:472–476
  14. Gold MI, Watkins WD, Sung Y, et al. Remifentanil versus remifentanil/midazolam for ambulatory surgery during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:51–57
  15. Sa Rego MM, Inagaki Y, White PF. Use of remifentanil during lithotripsy: intermittent boluses vs continuous infusion. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:S547
  16. Ganzberg S, Pape RA, Beck FM. Remifentanil for use during conscious sedation in outpatient oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:244–250

PII: S0266-4356(06)00104-5

doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 212-216 , April 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution