British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 1 , Pages 27-32, January 2008

Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system

  • B. Khambay

      Affiliations

    • Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
  • ,
  • N. Nairn

      Affiliations

    • Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
  • ,
  • A. Bell

      Affiliations

    • Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
  • ,
  • J. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • A. Bowman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • A.F. Ayoub

      Affiliations

    • Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 141 211 9604; fax: +44 141 211 9601.

Accepted 15 April 2007. published online 13 June 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional imaging system (Di3D).

Design

The three-dimensional imaging system was validated in vitro using 12 adult facial plaster casts, which had landmarks marked, and the positions of the landmarks on the three-dimensional images captured by Di3D were compared with those obtained by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM).

Methods

Operator error was measured by repeatedly locating landmarks on the three-dimensional image. Reproducibility error of the images was calculated by capturing three-dimensional images of the facial casts on two separate occasions; the Euclidean distance between the two matched sets of coordinates was then calculated. The Di3D system error was assessed by calculating the three-dimensional global positions of landmarks on the three-dimensional images and comparing them with those obtained by CMM (gold standard).

Results

The operator error in placement of landmarks on the three-dimensional model was 0.07mm, range 0.02–0.11mm. The reproducibility of the Di3D capture was 0.13mm, range 0.11–0.14mm. The mean distance between the CMM and Di3D landmarks, which constitutes the Di3D system error, was an average of 0.21mm, range 0.14–0.32mm.

Conclusions

The Di3D system error was within 0.2mm, which is clinically acceptable, and offers considerable improvement in stereophotogrammetry for facial capture and analysis.

Keywords: Imaging, Stereophotogrammetry, Validation, Reproducibility

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(07)00107-6

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.04.017

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 1 , Pages 27-32, January 2008