British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 177-179, April 2008

Risk factors for a bad split during sagittal split osteotomy

Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. Johannes Schubert, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, D-06097 Halle, Germany

Accepted 24 September 2007. published online 03 December 2007.

Abstract 

One of the operative complications during sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in orthognatic surgery is a bad split, meaning an undesired fracture of the mandible during osteotomy.

The aim of this study was to find out if there is a relation between the occurrence of bad splits during SSO and the presence of third molars, the patient's age, or the surgeon's experience.

Clinical notes of 110 consecutive patients who had had a total of 220 SSOs using the Obwegeser/Dal Pont technique were evaluated and divided into three groups: 1 missing third molar (n=168); 2 retained or impacted third molar that was removed during the SSO (n=23); and 3 third molar left in place during SSO (n=29).

There were a total of 12 (6%) bad splits. 9 (5%) in group 1, two (9%) in group 2, and one (3%) in group 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1–3, in particular the surgeon's qualification had no influence on the incidence. Older patients seemed more at risk of a bad split than younger ones.

Keywords: Sagittal split osteotomy, Bad split, Complications, Orthognatic surgery, Third molar

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(07)00471-8

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.011

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 177-179, April 2008