British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 8 , Pages 639-644, December 2008

Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography

  • G. Eggers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Tel.: +49 6221 56 7332; fax: +49 6221 56 33933.
    • ,
  • J. Klein

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    • ,
  • T. Welzel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radio-Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    • ,
  • J. Mühling

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Accepted 31 March 2008. published online 21 May 2008.

Abstract 

Digital volume tomography is a recently established imaging method that is based on the principle of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). One of its main applications is imaging in dental and maxillofacial surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the geometric accuracy of digital volume tomographic imaging with that of conventional CT and to assess the suitability for image-guided operating.

A calibration cube with a defined pattern of tubes inside was scanned using CT and digital volume tomography. Spatial accuracy was analysed with a software evaluation tool. The positions of the intersections of the tubes were detected in imaging data and registered to the real positions in the calibration body. The deviation was calculated and compared for CT and digital volume tomography.

Resolution of spatial images was similar for both methods. However, the spatial accuracy in digital volume tomography was slightly lower than that of CT but still in the submillimetric range. The accuracy was better in the middle, but lower in the margins of the volume. This is a disadvantage in technical image quality, but does not affect the diagnostic image quality. The geometric accuracy is sufficient for digital volume tomography-based image-guided surgery.

Keywords: Digital volume tomography, Cone beam computed tomography, Patient to image registration, Image-guided surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(08)00116-2

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.03.019

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 8 , Pages 639-644, December 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution