British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 360-362, July 2009

Is total nodal yield in neck dissections influenced by the method of specimen presentation to the pathologist?

  • Cyrus J. Kerawala

      Affiliations

    • Head and Neck Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 207 808 2371; fax: +44 207 808 2235.
  • ,
  • Brian Bisase

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Alix Hopper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom

Accepted 11 September 2008. published online 03 November 2008.

Abstract 

Excision of the lymphatic structures in the neck is an integral part of the management of many head and neck cancers. Some surgeons dissect the specimens intraoperatively and send the groups of lymph nodes to the histopathologists in separate pots; others provide only a complete en bloc lymphadenectomy and rely on the pathologist to identify the anatomical areas. We aimed to find out whether the method by which specimens are presented to the histopathologist influenced the total nodal yield in neck dissections.

Eighty-seven consecutive neck dissections were compared and information collated as to how the specimens were presented to the histopathologist. The mean total yield was 33 (range 15–57). There was no significant difference in total nodal yield between specimens presented to the pathologist either en bloc or in individual groups (p=0.4).

Although specimens of neck dissections divided intraoperatively and presenting in nodal groups to the histopathologist in separate pots most probably permits more accurate anatomical assessment, it does not influence the total yield.

Keywords: Neck dissection, Lymph nodes, Squamous cell carcinoma, Neoplasm metastasis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(08)00512-3

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.09.011

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 360-362, July 2009