British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 356-359, July 2009

Prognostic importance of site in squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa

  • R.J. Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery & Oncology, University of Liverpool, 5th Floor, UCD, LURH, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 706 4170.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 529 5286/706 4170; fax: +44 151 529 5288.
  • ,
  • G. McGlashan

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 529 5286.
  • ,
  • J.A. Woolgar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Pathology, University of Liverpool Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, UK
    • +44 151 706 5240.
  • ,
  • D. Lowe

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 529 5286.
  • ,
  • J.S. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 529 5286.
  • ,
  • E.D. Vaughan

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 529 5286.
  • ,
  • S.N. Rogers

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
    • +44 151 529 5286.

Accepted 22 September 2008. published online 08 December 2008.

Abstract 

While stage and grade of oral cancer have a profound and well-recognised influence on outcome, the effect of site is less clear and there have been relatively few published series that specifically address how site affects prognosis. Recent series have found that buccal cancers have a relatively poor prognosis compared with other sites, and suggest that this may be because the tumours are more aggressive. We examined 482 consecutive patients with oral cancers that had been operated on in a single unit, and report the presentation, treatment, and outcome of buccal tumours compared with those of other oral sites with reference to other prognostic variables. There were no significant differences between buccal and other cancers in patients’ characteristics, clinical presentation, or pathological staging, except in buccal tumours that rarely had pT1 stage (n=13,16%) compared with other sites (n=112, 28%, pT1-4, p=0.02). Despite a higher rate of frankly involved margins (p=0.02), the 5-year disease-specific survival was 70% for buccal tumours compared with 75% for other sites (p=0.34). We conclude that site had little influence on prognosis, and that the poor outcome of buccal cancers reported from other centres has not been replicated in our series.

Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Prognosis, Site, Buccal

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(08)00531-7

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.09.017

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 5 , Pages 356-359, July 2009