British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 6 , Pages 419-422, September 2010

Preoperative Doppler assessment of perforator anatomy in the anterolateral thigh flap

  • Richard J. Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool (or formally appointed to), UK
    • Department of Surgery & Oncology, School of Cancer Studies, University of Liverpool, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Surgery & Oncology, University of Liverpool, Department of Surgery & Oncology, University of Liverpool, Duncan Building, Daulby Street, L69 3GA Liverpool, UK. Tel.: +44 151 706 4183; fax: +44 151 706 5826.
  • ,
  • Martin D. Batstone

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool (or formally appointed to), UK
    • Maxillofacial Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Tim K. Blackburn

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool (or formally appointed to), UK
    • University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK
  • ,
  • James S. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool (or formally appointed to), UK

Accepted 17 August 2009. published online 18 September 2009.

Abstract 

Despite its many evident merits as a donor site, the principal disadvantage of the anterolateral thigh flap is the variability in its vascular anatomy. Preoperative assessment by Doppler of the vascular perforators has been advocated as routine. We report the accuracy of this method, and describe the strategy for rescue where adequate perforators are not evident. Eighty-six consecutive patients were marked preoperatively using hand-held Doppler and the pattern was compared with intraoperative findings. Assessment by Doppler predicted a median of 3 (range 0–8) perforator signals, and a median of 2 (range 0–5) was found intraoperatively. This overall trend towards false positives was exaggerated in thin thighs, but in the obese there were more false negative results. In 79% of cases explored medially it would have been possible to raise an apparently viable anteromedial thigh flap. As this can be done without extending the incision, it is the option of choice for rescue, although use of more proximal perforators may often be possible.

Keywords: Anterolateral thigh, Free flap, Doppler, Head and neck, Reconstruction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0266-4356(09)00510-5

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.08.016

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 6 , Pages 419-422, September 2010