Advertisement
Letter to the Editor| Volume 50, ISSUE 1, P90-91, January 2012

Download started.

Ok

Re: Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review

Published:December 09, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.006
      Sir,
      We read with interest the paper by Arakeri et al.
      • Arakeri G.
      • Kusanale A.
      • Zaki G.
      • Brennan P.A.
      Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review.
      on the pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. In this critical review the authors outlined the management and recognised the difficulties in the management of patients with post-traumatic ankylosis. A variety of techniques have been described
      • Arakeri G.
      • Kusanale A.
      • Zaki G.
      • Brennan P.A.
      Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review.
      including gap and interpositional arthroplasty, osteotomy and excision of the ankylotic mass within the TMJ. As far as the reconstruction is concerned again a variety of techniques that utilise bone or alloplastic materials have been described
      • Arakeri G.
      • Kusanale A.
      • Zaki G.
      • Brennan P.A.
      Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review.
      with variable outcomes. In our experience post-traumatic ankylosis is a challenging problem to correct. We recently examined
      • Kanatas A.N.
      • Jenkins G.W.
      • Smith A.B.
      • Worrall S.F.
      Changes in pain and mouth opening at 1 year following temporomandibular joint replacement—a prospective study.
      all our patients with ankylosis and have reported our outcomes.
      • Kanatas A.N.
      • Jenkins G.W.
      • Smith A.B.
      • Worrall S.F.
      Changes in pain and mouth opening at 1 year following temporomandibular joint replacement—a prospective study.
      Pain was seen to decrease over time and maximal mouth opening improved for females, males and the overall group only over the entirety of the study period. We do advocate a two stage technique with excision of the ankylotic material and with a second stage reconstruction with Custom joints that allows for changes in antero-posterior and vertical dimensions enabling changes in the occlusion to be made (Fig. 1). It is clear from the paper from Arakeri et al. that in the literature there are several studies that advocate a different and maybe equally successful management of such patients. The patient numbers are small for higher level studies and in the era of evidence based medicine it is time to think about a multicenter randomised trial that if well design will give us answer that can only be of benefit to our patients.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig. 1Ankylosis and a model of a custom TMJ implant as used by the authors.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

      References

        • Arakeri G.
        • Kusanale A.
        • Zaki G.
        • Brennan P.A.
        Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Kanatas A.N.
        • Jenkins G.W.
        • Smith A.B.
        • Worrall S.F.
        Changes in pain and mouth opening at 1 year following temporomandibular joint replacement—a prospective study.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; ([Epub ahead of print])