Research Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 3, P215-220, April 2012

Download started.


Analysis of the impact of deprivation on urgent suspected head and neck cancer referrals in the Mersey region between January 2004 to December 2006

  • Paul Brocklehurst
    Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Coupland 3, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • Raheela Rafiq
    Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • Derek Lowe
    Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK

    Edge Hill University, Liverpool and Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk.UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • Simon Rogers
    Corresponding author at: Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 1AL, UK. Tel.: +44 151 529 5287.
    Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK

    Edge Hill University, Liverpool and Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk.UK
    Search for articles by this author


      Serious delay in patients presenting with head and neck cancer is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to examine the influence of deprivation on professional delay in the Mersey region from 2004 to 2006. The study sample comprised 6681 patients who were referred between January 2004 and December 2006. The dataset was dominated by the largest hospital (H1), which received 48% of all cases. Median referral overall was 12 days (IQR 8–15 days), and 74% of patients were referred in 14 days or less. Professional delay (percentage 14 days or less) was associated with hospital (from 58% H1 to 97% H5), year of referral (from 64% in 2004 to 80% in 2006), age (from 69% under 55 years to 80% over 75 years), and deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 from 67% most deprived (IMD 1) to 85% least deprived (IMD 5)). Hospital location was associated with these factors and the results imply that by far, the most important variable in predicting professional delay was the hospital that received the referral. Trends over time in age, and to a lesser extent, for deprivation were noted in H1, but were largely absent across other hospitals. Some of them needed to make substantial improvements to meet the two-week referral pathway and it would be interesting to compare these results with current practice. This study highlights the importance of maintaining the standards of the current policy on two-week referrals for suspected head and neck malignancy.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Cancer Research UK. UK oral cancer statistics. Available from

        • Day G.L.
        • Blot W.J.
        Second primary tumors in patients with oral cancer.
        Cancer. 1992; 70: 14-19
      2. National Cancer Intelligence Network. Oral cavity cancer: survival trends in England. Available from

        • McLeod N.M.
        • Saeed N.R.
        • Ali E.A.
        Oral cancer: delays in referral and diagnosis persist.
        Br Dent J. 2005; 198: 681-684
        • Onizawa K.
        • Nishihara K.
        • Yamagata K.
        • Yusa H.
        • Yanagawa T.
        • Yoshida H.
        Factors associated with diagnostic delay of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
        Oral Oncol. 2003; 39: 781-788
        • Lingen M.W.
        • Kalmar J.R.
        • Karrison T.
        • Speight P.M.
        Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2008; 44: 10-22
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Woolgar J.A.
        • Lowe D.
        • Magennis P.
        • Shaw R.J.
        • et al.
        Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: 201-211
        • Scott S.E.
        • Grunfield E.A.
        • Auyeung V.
        • McGurk M.
        Barriers and triggers to seeking help for potentially malignant oral symptoms: implications for interventions.
        J Public Health Dent. 2009; 69: 34-40
        • Scott S.E.
        • Grunfeld E.A.
        • McGurk M.
        The idiosyncratic relationship between diagnostic delay and stage of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
        Oral Oncol. 2005; 41: 396-403
        • Scott S.E.
        • McGurk M.
        • Grunfeld E.A.
        Patient delay for potentially malignant oral symptoms.
        Eur J Oral Sci. 2008; 116: 141-147
        • Conway D.I.
        • Petticrew M.
        • Marlborough H.
        • Berthiller J.
        • Hashibe M.
        • Macpherson L.M.
        Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.
        Int J Cancer. 2008; 122: 2811-2819
        • Conway D.I.
        • Stockton D.L.
        • Warnakulasuriya K.A.
        • Ogden G.
        • Macpherson L.M.
        Incidence of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in United Kingdom (1990–1999)—recent trends and regional variation.
        Oral Oncol. 2006; 42: 586-592
        • Greenwood M.
        • Thomson P.J.
        • Lowry R.J.
        • Steen I.N.
        Oral cancer: material deprivation, unemployment and risk factor behaviour—an initial study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32: 74-77
        • Conway D.I.
        • McMahon A.D.
        • Smith K.
        • Black R.
        • Robertson G.
        • Devine J.
        • et al.
        Components of socioeconomic risk associated with head and neck cancer: A population-based case–control study in Scotland.
        Brit J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48: 11-17
        • Conway D.I.
        • McKinney P.A.
        • McMahon A.D.
        • Ahrens W.
        • Schmeisser N.
        • Benhamou S.
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic factors associated with risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancer in Europe.
        Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 588-598
        • Wildt J.
        • Bungaard T.
        • Bentzen S.M.
        Delay in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 1995; 20: 21-25
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Pabla R.
        • McSorley A.
        • Lowe D.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Vaughan E.D.
        An assessment of deprivation as a factor in the delays in presentation, diagnosis and treatment in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
        Oral Oncol. 2007; 43: 648-655
      3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. Clinical Guideline 27. London: National Health Service; 2005.

        • Rogers S.N.
        • Glen P.
        • Robinson A.
        • Lowe D.
        • Grieveson B.
        • Edwards D.
        A survey of general dental practitioners in Merseyside regarding urgent appointments and suspected cancer referrals.
        Prim Dent Care. 2008; 15: 25-30
        • Brocklehurst P.R.
        • Baker S.R.
        • Speight P.M.
        A qualitative study examining the experience of primary care dentists in the detection and management of potentially malignant lesions. 1. Factors influencing the screen and the decision to refer.
        Br Dent J. 2010; 208: 72-73
        • Brocklehurst P.R.
        • Baker S.R.
        • Speight P.M.
        Factors which determine the referral of potentially malignant lesions by primary care dentists.
        J Dent. 2010; 38: 569-578
        • Carter L.M.
        • Ogden G.R.
        Oral cancer awareness of general medical and general dental practitioners.
        Br Dent J. 2007; 203: 248-249
        • Carter L.M.
        • Ogden G.R.
        Oral cancer awareness of undergraduate medical and dental students.
        BMC Med Educ. 2007; 7: 44
        • Macpherson L.M.
        • McCann M.F.
        • Gibson J.
        • Binnie V.I.
        • Stephen K.W.
        The role of primary healthcare professionals in oral cancer prevention and detection.
        Br Dent J. 2003; 195: 277-281
        • Kujan O.
        • Duxbury A.J.
        • Glenny A.M.
        • Thakker N.S.
        • Sloan P.
        Opinions and attitudes of the UK's PCDs and specialists in oral surgery, oral medicine and surgical dentistry on oral cancer screening.
        Oral Dis. 2006; 12: 194-199
        • Greenwood M.
        • Lowry R.J.
        Primary care clinicians’ knowledge of oral cancer: a study of dentists and doctors in the North East of England.
        Br Dent J. 2001; 191: 510-512
      4. National Cancer Intelligence Network. Routes to diagnosis. Available from

        • Singh P.
        • Warnakulasuriya S.
        The two-week wait cancer initiative on oral cancer; the predictive value of urgent referrals to an oral medicine unit.
        Br Dent J. 2006; 201: 717-720
        • Lyons M.
        • Philpott J.
        • Hore I.
        • Watters G.
        Audit of referrals for head and neck cancer—the effect of the 2-week, fast track referral system.
        Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004; 29: 143-145
        • McKie C.
        • Ahmad U.A.
        • Fellows S.
        • Meikle D.
        • Stafford F.W.
        • Thomson P.J.
        • et al.
        The 2-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer in the United Kingdom: referral patterns, diagnostic efficacy of the guidelines and compliance.
        Oral Oncol. 2008; 44: 851-856
        • Hobson J.C.
        • Malla J.V.
        • Sinha J.
        • Kay N.J.
        • Ramamurthy I.
        Outcomes for patients referred urgently with suspected head and neck cancer.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2008; 122: 1241-1244
        • Rodgers J.
        • Macpherson L.M.
        • Smith G.L.
        • Crighton A.J.
        • Carton A.T.
        • Conway D.I.
        Characteristics of patients attending rapid access clinics during the West of Scotland Cancer Awareness Programme oral cancer campaign.
        Br Dent J. 2007; 202: 680-681