Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 6, P500-503, September 2012

Cardiac output monitoring to guide fluid replacement in head and neck microvascular free flap surgery—what is current practice in the UK?

Published:September 22, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.08.010

      Abstract

      Appropriate fluid balance is an important factor in the survival of free flaps, and recently there has been a shift towards more conservative fluid regimens. Several surgical specialties have made extensive use of the relatively non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output (CO) to optimise fluid balance during and after surgery, which has resulted in a shorter hospital stay, but little has been published in head and neck surgery. To ascertain its use in the head and neck we sent a postal questionnaire to the anaesthetic departments of 40 major head and neck units identified from the 2010 database of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS). Questions were asked about the number of free flaps done in the unit each year, the monitoring of central venous and arterial blood pressure (and inotrope protocols), optimal target variables, and whether CO was monitored (with type of device). Thirty-two units responded (80%). While 26 units (81%) routinely monitored central venous pressure (CVP), CO was monitored in only 3 units (9%). There was a wide range of responses in relation to optimal variables and use of inotropes. As with other specialties, it is likely that CO monitoring will become widely used in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Not only does it enhance fluid optimisation, but it may also reduce hospital stay and morbidity. Appropriate clinical studies are urgently needed to evaluate its use in our specialty.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Clark J.R.
        • McCluskey S.A.
        • Hall F.
        • Lipa J.
        • Neligan P.
        • Brown D.
        • et al.
        Predictors of morbidity following free flap reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck.
        Head Neck. 2007; 29: 1090-1101
        • Patel R.S.
        • McCluskey S.A.
        • Goldstein D.P.
        • Minkovich L.
        • Irish J.C.
        • Brown D.H.
        • et al.
        Perioperative complications and prolonged hospital stay in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck.
        Head Neck. 2010; 32: 1345-1353
        • Marsh M.
        • Elliott S.
        • Anand R.
        • Brennan P.A.
        Early postoperative care for free flap head and neck reconstructive surgery—a national survey of practice.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 47: 182-185
        • Sigurdsson G.H.
        Perioperative fluid management in microvascular surgery.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 1995; 11: 57-65
        • Namdar T.
        • Bartscher T.
        • Stollwerck P.L.
        • Mailänder P.
        • Lange T.
        Complete free flap loss due to extensive hemodilution.
        Microsurgery. 2010; 30: 214-217
        • Haughey B.H.
        • Wilson E.
        • Kluwe L.
        • Piccirillo J.
        • Fredrickson J.
        • Sessions D.
        • et al.
        Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 125: 10-17
        • Ng K.F.
        • Lam C.C.
        • Chan L.C.
        In vivo effect of haemodilution with saline oncoagulation: a randomized controlled trial.
        Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88: 475-480
        • Junghans T.
        • Neuss H.
        • Strohauer M.
        • Raue W.
        • Haase O.
        • Schink T.
        • et al.
        Hypovolemia after traditional preoperative care in patients undergoing colonic surgery is underrepresented in conventional hemodynamic monitoring.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006; 21: 693-697
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kim J.T.
        • Yoon S.Z.
        • Lim Y.J.
        • Jeon Y.
        • Bahk J.H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
        Br J Anaesth. 2007; 99: 343-348
        • Noblett S.E.
        • Snowden C.P.
        • Shenton B.K.
        • Horgan A.F.
        Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection.
        Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 1069-1076
        • Wakeling H.G.
        • McFall M.R.
        • Jenkins C.S.
        • Woods W.G.
        • Miles W.F.
        • Barclay G.R.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery.
        Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95: 634-642
        • Venn R.
        • Steele A.
        • Richardson P.
        • Poloniecki J.
        • Grounds M.
        • Newman P.
        Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures.
        Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88: 65-71
        • Pearse R.M.
        • Ikram K.
        • Barry J.
        Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output.
        Crit Care. 2004; 8: 190-195
        • Lahner D.
        • Kabon B.
        • Marschalek C.
        • Chiari A.
        • Pestel G.
        • Kaider A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively.
        Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103: 346-351
        • Green D.
        • Paklet L.
        Latest developments in peri-operative monitoring of the high-risk major surgery patient.
        Int J Surg. 2010; 8: 90-99
        • Abdel Galil K.
        • Craske D.
        • McCaul J.
        Optimisation of intraoperative haemodynamics: early experience of its use in major head and neck surgery.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48: 189-191
        • Adams J.
        • Charlton P.
        Anaesthesia for microvascular free tissue transfer.
        Br J Anaesth CEPD Rev. 2003; : 1-5
        • Hagau N.
        • Longrois D.
        Anesthesia for free vascularized tissue transfer.
        Microsurgery. 2009; 29: 161-167
        • Gardiner M.D.
        • Nanchahal J.
        Strategies to ensure success of microvascular free tissue transfer.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: e665-e673
        • Wang W.D.
        • Liang L.J.
        • Huang X.Q.
        • Yin X.Y.
        Low central venous pressure reduces blood loss in hepatectomy.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 935-939
      1. British guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy for adult surgical patients. Available from URL: http://journal.ics.ac.uk/pdf/1001013.pdf; 2008.