The LeFort I osteotomy is standard for corrective repositioning of the maxilla, but intraoperative, skull-related, three-dimensional repositioning of the maxilla remains unsolved. Different ways of improving the accuracy of intraoperative, preoperatively planned, skull-related, correcting movements have been described, including the measurement of vertical maxillary shift, use of positioning devices (such as a face bow or a halo frame), and computer-assisted navigation. Nevertheless, intraoperative three-dimensional control of maxillary shift is not standard. Intraoperatively adjusted positioning pins define an exactly reproducible skull-related position for a reference splint. Skull-related repositioning of the maxilla after osteotomy can be done precisely in combination with two further splints, each allowing for different, well-defined repositioning of the reference splint in relation to the maxillary dental arch. The positioning device can be inserted using the standard intraoral approaches of the Le Fort I osteotomy. It does not result in further radiation exposure for the patient besides that usually necessary for preoperative planning. Three-dimensional imaging and expensive, computer-assisted navigational systems are not required. In contrast to previous procedures, the new device allows for intraoperative, three-dimensional, skull-related repositioning of the maxilla exactly according to the position planned preoperatively.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Le Forte I osteotomy for correction of maxillary deformities.J Oral Surg. 1975; 33: 412-426
- Surgical-cephalometric bite reconstruction (double splint method).Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1977; 32 ([in German]): 260-261
- Predictability of maxillary surgery: a comparison of internal and external reference marks.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 61: 542-545
- Measuring changes in maxillary height during osteotomy surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 32: 257-259
- Refined intraoperative repositioning of the osteotomized maxilla in relation to the skull and TMJ.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1988; 16: 8-12
- Techniques for achieving three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla applied in conjunction with the Gottingen concept.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998; 13: 248-258
- A halo-caliper guidance system for bi-maxillary (dual-arch) orthognathic surgery.J Maxillofac Surg. 1984; 12: 167-173
- Condylar position control during maxillary surgery: the condylar positioning appliance and three-dimensional double splint method.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1990; 5: 161-165
- Intraoral condyle-related positioning of the maxilla in Le Fort 1 osteotomies.Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990; 45 ([in German]): S75-S78
- Navigation surgery for Le Fort 1 osteotomy in a fibrous dysplasia patient.Odontology. 2010; 98: 181-184
- Simulation-guided navigation: a new approach to improve intraoperative three-dimensional reproducibility during orthognathic surgery.J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1698-1705
- Comparison of the predicted surgical results following virtual planning with those actually achieved following bimaxillary operation of dysgnathia.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005; 33: 8-12
- Accuracy of maxillary positioning in bimaxillary surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 47: 446-449
Published online: November 24, 2011
Accepted: November 1, 2011
© 2011 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.