Advertisement
Technical note| Volume 50, ISSUE 2, P183-184, March 2012

Download started.

Ok

Aesthetic incision for neck dissection

Published:December 26, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.02.011
      The incision for a neck dissection should allow adequate access to allow good nodal harvest with minimal morbidity. Another concern is aesthetics. Patients with head and neck cancer have extensive operations, and scarring from the surgical wounds contributes to morbidity. We describe an incision that gives adequate access, is aesthetically satisfactory, and does not compromise the yield of lymph nodes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Acar A.
        • Dursun G.
        • Aydin O.
        • Akbaş Y.
        J incision in neck dissections.
        J Laryngol Otol. 1998; 112: 55-60
        • Draaijers L.J.
        • Tempelman F.R.
        • Botman Y.A.
        • et al.
        The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 1960-1965
        • Vercelli S.
        • Ferriero G.
        • Sartorio F.
        • Stissi V.
        • Franchignoni F.
        How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 2055-2063
        • Stavrou D.
        • Haik J.
        • Weissman O.
        • Goldan O.
        • Tessone A.
        • Winkler E.
        Patient and observer scar assessment scale: how good is it.
        J Wound Care. 2009; 18: 171-176