Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 8, P706-711, December 2012

Download started.

Ok

Anatomical surgical planning for oral and oropharyngeal primary carcinoma combined with adjuvant treatment where indicated is associated with improved local control

      Abstract

      We aimed to find out whether surgical tactics that lead to a reduction in tumour-involved surgical margins also improve local control. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive case series (n = 162) of previously untreated patients who had operations for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Extensive use was made of computed tomographic multiplanar imaging to plan primary resections. Nine patients (6%) had tumour at the resection margin. Local control at 36 months was 96%, disease-specific survival (DSS) was 86%, and overall survival (OS) was 77%. Carefully planned primary operation for SCC of the oral cavity and oropharynx to minimise tumour-involved margins combined with conventional adjuvant treatment where indicated, is associated with a high probability of local control and disease-specific survival.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McMahon J.D.
        • Devine J.C.
        • Hetherington J.
        • et al.
        Involved surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal carcinima—an anatomical problem?.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 49: 172-175
      1. Sobin L.H. Gospodarowicz M.K. Wittekind C.H. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Blackwell, Oxford2010
        • McMahon J.
        • Devine J.C.
        • McCaul J.A.
        • McLellan D.R.
        • Farrow A.
        Use of Lugol's iodine in the resection of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48: 84-87
        • Helliwell T.R.
        • Woolgar J.A.
        Datasets for histopathology reports on head and neck carcinoma and salivary neoplasms.
        2nd ed. Royal College of Pathologists, London2005
        • Wong L.S.
        • McMahon J.
        • Devine J.
        • et al.
        Influence of close resection margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Mücke T.
        • Wagenpfeil S.
        • Kesting M.R.
        • Hölzle F.
        • Wolff K.D.
        Recurrence interval affects survival after local relapse of oral cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: 687-691
        • Patel R.S.
        • Goldstein D.P.
        • Guillemaud J.
        • et al.
        Impact of positive frozen section microscopic tumor cut-through revised to negative on oral carcinoma control and survival rates.
        Head Neck. 2010; 32: 1444-1451
        • González-Garcia R.
        • Naval-Gias L.
        • Román-Romero L.
        • Sastre-Pérez J.
        • Rodriguez-Campo F.J.
        Local recurrences and second primary tumors from squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a retrospective analytic study of 500 patients.
        Head Neck. 2009; 31: 1168-1180
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Woolgar J.A.
        • et al.
        Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: 201-211
        • Binahmed A.
        • Nason R.W.
        • Abdoh A.A.
        The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2007; 43: 780-784
        • Brauckhoff M.
        • Machens A.
        • Thanh P.N.
        • et al.
        Impact of extent of resection for thyroid cancer invading the aerodigestive tract on surgical morbidity, local recurrence, and cancer-specific survival.
        Surgery. 2010; 148: 1257-1266
        • Ganly I.
        • Patel S.G.
        • Singh B.
        • et al.
        Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the skull base in the elderly: an international collaborative study.
        Cancer. 2011; 117: 563-571
        • Novais E.N.
        • Demiralp B.
        • Alderete J.
        • Larson M.C.
        • Rose P.S.
        • Sim F.H.
        Do surgical margin and local recurrence influence survival in soft tissue sarcomas?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 486: 3003-3011
        • Isbarn H.
        • Warner M.
        • Salomon G.
        • et al.
        Long-term data on the survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen era.
        BJU Int. 2010; 106: 37-43
        • Novara G.
        • Svalek R.S.
        • Karakiewicz P.I.
        • et al.
        Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients.
        J Urol. 2010; 183: 2165-2170
        • Houssami N.
        • Macaskill P.
        • Marinovich M.L.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
        Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 3219-3232
        • Compton C.C.
        • Fielding L.P.
        • Burgart L.J.
        • et al.
        Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124: 979-994
      2. Cancer in Scotland Summary, Cancer statistics ISD Scotland. Available from URL: http://www.isdscotland.org.

        • Loree T.R.
        • Strong E.W.
        Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma.
        Am J Surg. 1990; 160: 410-414
        • Slootweg P.J.
        • Hordijk G.J.
        • Schade Y.
        • Van Es R.J.
        • Koole R.
        Treatment failure and margin status in head and neck cancer. A critical view on the potential value of molecular pathology.
        Oral Oncol. 2002; 38: 500-503
        • Sutton D.N.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Vaughan E.D.
        • Woolgar J.A.
        The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32: 30-34
        • Wibe A.
        • Møller B.
        • Norstein J.
        • et al.
        A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 857-866
        • Lee C.C.
        • Ho H.C.
        • Chou P.
        Multivariate analyses to assess the effect of surgeon volume on survival rate in oral cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.
        Oral Oncol. 2010; 46: 271-275