Advertisement

Evaluation of the limitations of using the University of Washington Quality of Life swallowing domain alone to screen patients in the routine clinical setting

      Abstract

      A broad patient-completed screening tool in routine clinical practice in head and neck oncology has merit, but clinicians should be aware that its simplicity could lead to some patients and the detail of their problems being missed. The purpose of this study was to compare the University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQoL) swallowing domain with the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in relation to the need for interventions for swallowing around one year after treatment. The group comprised 112 consecutively referred patients to speech and language therapy between January 2007 and August 2009 after primary operation for previously untreated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A total of 78 patients completed questionnaires (median time of assessment 11.7 months, IQR 6.1–12.2). There were significant (p < 0.001) and moderately strong correlations (rs = 0.51–0.62) between the UWQoL swallowing domain score and MDADI subscales and total scores, and also with individual MDADI questions: taking a great deal of effort (rs = 0.71); being upset (rs = 0.61); and not going out (rs = 0.62) were the strongest in regard to swallowing. Use of a gastrostomy tube was associated with worse UWQoL and MDADI scores. In conclusion, patients who score 100 on the UWQoL do not require swallowing to be evaluated further. Those who score 70 could benefit from the detailed MDADI to help to clarify the specific problem and the impact it has before being referred to speech and language therapy. Those who score less than 70 should be brought to the attention of speech and language therapists to confirm that appropriate support and intervention are in place.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gillespie M.B.
        • Brodsky M.B.
        • Day T.A.
        • Lee F.S.
        • Martin-Harris B.
        Swallowing-related quality of life after head and neck cancer treatment.
        Laryngoscope. 2004; 114: 1362-1367
        • Kazi R.
        • Prasad V.
        • Venkitaraman R.
        • Nutting C.M.
        • Clarke P.
        • Rhys Evans P.
        • et al.
        Questionnaire analysis of swallowing related outcomes following glossectomy.
        ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008; 70: 151-155
        • Wilson J.A.
        • Carding P.N.
        • Patterson J.M.
        Dysphagia after nonsurgical head and neck cancer treatment: patients’ perspectives.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145: 767-771
        • Chen A.Y.
        • Frankowski R.
        • Bishop-Leone J.
        • Hebert T.
        • Leyk S.
        • Lewin J.
        • et al.
        The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M.D. Anderson dysphagia inventory.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127: 870-876
        • McHorney C.A.
        • Bricker D.E.
        • Robbins J.
        • Kramer A.E.
        • Rosenbek J.C.
        • Chignell K.A.
        The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults. II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.
        Dysphagia. 2000; 15: 122-133
        • Wallace K.L.
        • Middleton S.
        • Cook I.J.
        Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.
        Gastroenterology. 2000; 118: 678-687
        • Rinkel R.N.
        • Verdonck-de Leeuw I.M.
        • Langendijk J.A.
        • van Reij E.J.
        • Aaronson N.K.
        • Leemans C.R.
        The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: e67-e71
        • Dwivedi R.C.
        • St Rose S.
        • Roe J.W.
        • Khan A.S.
        • Pepper C.
        • Nutting C.M.
        • et al.
        Validation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients.
        Oral Oncol. 2010; 46: e10-e14
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Lowe D.
        • Yueh B.
        • Weymuller Jr., E.A.
        The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 136: 352-357
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Lowe D.
        Screening for dysfunction to promote multidisciplinary intervention by using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 135: 369-375
        • Thomas L.
        • Jones T.M.
        • Tandon S.
        • Katre C.
        • Lowe D.
        • Rogers S.N.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life swallowing domain following oropharyngeal cancer.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 265: S29-S37
        • Zuydam A.C.
        • Lowe D.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Vaughan E.D.
        • Rogers S.N.
        Predictors of speech and swallowing function following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2005; 30: 428-437
        • Dwivedi R.C.
        • Chisholm E.J.
        • Khan A.S.
        • Harris N.J.
        • Bhide S.A.
        • St Rose S.
        • et al.
        An exploratory study of the influence of clinico-demographic variables on swallowing and swallowing-related quality of life in a cohort or oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with primary surgery.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 269: 1233-1239
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Thomson R.
        • O’Toole P.
        • Lowe D.
        Patients experience with long-term percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2007; 43: 499-507
        • Oozeer N.B.
        • Corsar K.
        • Glore R.J.
        • Penney S.
        • Patterson J.
        • Paleri V.
        The impact of enteral feeding route on patient-reported long term swallowing outcome after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.
        Oral Oncol. 2011; 47: 980-983
        • Rogers S.N.
        • El-Sheikha J.
        • Lowe D.
        The development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: 555-561
      1. Ghazali N, Kanatas A, Scott B, Lowe D, Zuydam A, Rogers SN, et al. The use of the Patient Concerns Inventory in identification of speech and swallowing problems following treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. J Laryngol Otol; in press.