A 40-year-old patient who had been released from prison under an antisocial behavioural order with a radiofrequency identification device (RFID) attached, presented to our department with a neck lump that required magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We were surprised that the scanning department insisted on the removal of the device before the scan for alleged safety issues, which resulted in considerable problems for the police, prison authorities, and patient. This raised the question of whether removal of the device was genuinely necessary (Fig. 1).
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Application safety evaluation of the radio frequency identification tag under magnetic resonance imaging.Biomed Eng Online. 2014; 13: 129
- Evaluation of MRI issues for an access port with a Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) tag.Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 31: 1439-1444
- Safety and reliability of radio frequency identification devices in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.Patient Saf Surg. 2010; 4: 2
- Assessment of safety and interference issues of radio frequencyidentification devices in 0.3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.Sci World J. 2014; 2014: 735762
Published online: November 22, 2019
Crown Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.