Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 58, ISSUE 3, P348-354, April 2020

Current perspectives on the surgical management of mandibular third molars in the United Kingdom: the need for further research

      Abstract

      This survey of expert opinion regarding the management of mandibular third molar (M3M) impaction and its clinical sequelae was circulated to all members of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS). It was completed by 289 clinicians who reported treating 60 003 patients annually. Respondents included 199 (69%) specialists and 58 (20%) primary care clinicians. Most (99%) of the clinicians treated at least one M3M with complete surgical removal (CSR) annually. Only 69% performed one or more coronectomies (COR). Advocates of coronectomy reported lower rates of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury, but IAN, lingual nerve, and adjacent second molar damage were rare, occurring in less than 0.5% of cases, with small differences between the COR and CSR groups. Although these differences are not statistically significant, they are likely to be clinically important. Also, the COR group would have comprised mainly high-risk teeth, while the CSR group would include many teeth at low risk of complications. This might have skewed the results. Those clinicians performing no coronectomies cited three main reasons for being low adopters of COR: the lack of irrefutable evidence to support its benefit, the increased need for a second operation, and more non-IAN complications. Although COR may prevent permanent IAN damage in high-risk cases, this paper highlights clinicians’ views that there is a gap in evidence and knowledge to support COR. As a result, 47% of the clinicians surveyed recommended, and were prepared to participate in, further studies to determine the effectiveness and safety of COR.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Leung Y.Y.
        • Cheung L.K.
        Long-term morbidities of coronectomy on lower third molar.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 121: 5-11
        • Renton T.
        • Al-Haboubi M.
        • Pau A.
        • et al.
        What has been the United Kingdom’s experience with retention of third molars?.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: S48-S57
        • Sarikov R.
        • Juodzbalys G.
        Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review.
        J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014; 5: e1
        • Valmaseda-Castellón E.
        • Berini-Aytés L.
        • Gay-Escoda C.
        Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92: 377-383
        • Gülicher D.
        • Gerlach K.L.
        Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30: 306-312
        • McArdle L.W.
        • Renton T.
        The effects of NICE guidelines on the management of third molar teeth.
        Br Dent J. 2012; 213: E8
        • Patel N.
        • Ali S.
        • Yates J.M.
        Quality of life following injury to the inferior dental or lingual nerve – a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.
        Oral Surg. 2018; 11: 9-16
        • Rood J.P.
        • Shehab B.A.
        The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 28: 20-25
        • Smith W.P.
        The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115: 18-24
        • Bell G.W.
        Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42: 21-27
        • Patel V.
        • Moore S.
        • Sproat C.
        Coronectomy - oral surgery’s answer to modern day conservative dentistry.
        Br Dent J. 2010; 209: 111-114
        • Ecuyer J.
        • Debien J.
        Surgical deductions.
        Actual Odontostomatol (Paris). 1984; 38 (Article in French): 695-702
        • Hatano Y.
        • Kurita K.
        • Kuroiwa Y.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluations of coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy) for mandibular third molars using dental computed tomography: a case-control study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 1806-1814
        • Cilasun U.
        • Yildirim T.
        • Guzeldemir E.
        • et al.
        Coronectomy in patients with high risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury diagnosed by computed tomography.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 1557-1561
        • Renton T.
        • Hankins M.
        • Sproate C.
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 43: 7-12
        • Leung Y.Y.
        • Cheung L.K.
        Safety of coronectomy versus excision of wisdom teeth: a randomized controlled trial.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 821-827
        • Coulthard P.
        • Bailey E.
        • Esposito M.
        • et al.
        Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; CD004345
        • Patel V.
        • Sproat C.
        • Samani M.
        • et al.
        Unerupted teeth associated with dentigerous cysts and treated with coronectomy: mini case series.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 51: 644-649
        • Martin A.
        • Perinetti G.
        • Costantinides F.
        • et al.
        Coronectomy as a surgical approach to impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review.
        Head Face Med. 2015; 11: 9
        • Chan S.W.
        • Tulloch E.
        • Cooper E.S.
        • et al.
        Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?.
        BMJ. 2017; 357: j2224
        • Devine M.
        • Gerrard G.
        • Renton T.
        Current practice in mandibular third molar surgery. A national survey of British Association of Oral Surgeons membership.
        Oral Surg. 2017; 10: 11-19
        • Jerjes W.
        • Upile T.
        • Shah P.
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109: 335-345
        • Matzen L.H.
        • Christensen J.
        • Hintze H.
        • et al.
        Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 4298870341
        • Flygare L.
        • Ohman A.
        Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2008; 12: 291-302
        • Moxey A.
        • O’Connell D.
        • McGettigan P.
        • et al.
        Describing treatment effects to patients.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 948-959