The authors regret the follow errors in the above published paper:
- 1In the section: “Assessing risk of bias across and within studies”, in the first paragraph, “nine moderate bias5,12,14-21” is incorrectly cited. It should be replaced by “nine moderate bias5,12,14-20.”
- 2In the Discussion, section “Summary of evidence” sentence: ‘It has been reported that these tumours can recur after as long as 30 years20’ should be replaced with ‘It has been reported that these tumours can recur after as long as 30 years21’.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 12, 2020
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Recurrence rate of odontogenic myxoma after different treatments: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 57Issue 10
- PreviewOur aim was to establish the recurrence rate of odontogenic myxoma after different treatments. Our search covered papers from 1972-2017 from different sources. The papers were evaluated and critically appraised by two independent investigators. The recurrence rate and 95% CI were calculated in relation to each specific treatment, and the chi squared test was calculated to find out if there was any significant difference in the recurrence rate between conservative treatment and resection. The overall recurrence rate was 5 of 39 patients (13%) during a mean follow up period of 10 years.
- Full-Text
- Preview
