Advertisement
Review| Volume 58, ISSUE 7, P748-752, September 2020

Systematic review of lingual nerve retraction during surgical mandibular third molar extractions

      Abstract

      The lingual nerve is at risk of damage during mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery. Current trends to avoid lingual retraction and prevent injury to the nerve run counter to the surgical principles of locating and protecting important structures. To our knowledge, the last review of this subject only considered repurposed lingual retractors such as the Howarth. Other studies have reported the use of purpose-built retractors with improved outcomes for lingual nerve injuries. This systematic review aims to assess the current view regarding lingual nerve retraction in M3M surgery. A search of PubMed and Web of Science using the key words “lingual”, “nerve”, “retractor”, and “retraction” returned 118 results, 10 of which were selected for inclusion (nine original research papers and one systematic review). The data comprised 16,133 M3M extractions using no lingual retractor, repurposed, and purpose-built retractors. No lingual retraction showed a 0.60% risk of temporary and a 0.08% risk of permanent injury to the nerve. Repurposed retractors showed a 7.9% risk of temporary and 0.41% risk of permanent injury, and purpose-built retractors a 0.56% risk of temporary injury. No reported cases of permanent injury were associated with the use of purpose-built instruments. The evidence suggests that whilst the use of repurposed retractors increases the risk of injury to the nerve, there is no such risk with purpose-built retractors. Current data sets are confounded by the limitations of non-randomised, non-blinded studies, but trends show that lingual nerve retraction with purpose-built retractors may help to prevent permanent injury to the lingual nerve.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Guidance on the extraction of wisdom teeth.
        2000
        • Hounsome J.
        • Pilkington G.
        • Mahon J.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars.
        Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, 2017 (Available from URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-tag525/documents/assessment-report (last accessed 20 February 2020).)
        • Baqain Z.H.
        • Abukaraky A.
        • Hassoneh Y.
        • et al.
        Lingual nerve morbidity and mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective study.
        Med Princ Pract. 2010; 19: 28-32
        • Yadav S.
        • Verma A.
        • Sachdeva A.
        Assessment of lingual nerve injury using different surgical variables for mandibular third molar surgery: a clinical study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 889-893
        • Smith W.P.
        The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115: 18-24
        • Moss C.E.
        • Wake M.J.
        Lingual access for third molar surgery: a 20-year retrospective audit.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 37: 255-258
        • Stacy G.C.
        Lingual exposure during mandibular third molar surgery.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1977; 6: 334-339
        • Pichler J.W.
        • Beirne O.R.
        Lingual flap retraction and prevention of lingual nerve damage associated with third molar surgery: a systematic review of the literature.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91: 395-401
        • Pogrel M.A.
        • Goldman K.E.
        Lingual flap retraction for third molar removal.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 1125-1130
        • Gomes A.C.
        • Vasconcelos B.C.
        • de Oliveira e Silva E.D.
        • et al.
        Lingual nerve damage after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 1443-1446
        • Valmaseda-Castellón E.
        • Berini-Aytés L.
        • Gay-Escoda C.
        Lingual nerve damage after third lower molar surgical extraction.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90: 567-573
        • Boffano P.
        • Roccia F.
        • Gallesio C.
        Lingual nerve deficit following mandibular third molar removal: review of the literature and medicolegal considerations.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113: e10-18
        • Kushnerev E.
        • Yates J.M.
        Evidence-based outcomes following inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury and repair: a systematic review.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 42: 786-802
        • To E.W.
        • Chan F.F.
        Lingual nerve retractor.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 32: 125-126
        • Vader J.P.
        Retractor design and the lingual nerve.
        Lancet. 1992; 339: 1117
        • Shepherd J.P.
        • Brickley M.R.
        Retractor design and the lingual nerve.
        Lancet. 1992; 339: 1116-1117
        • Greenwood M.
        • Langton S.G.
        • Rood J.P.
        A comparison of broad and narrow retractors for lingual nerve protection during lower third molar surgery.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 32: 114-117
        • Rehman K.
        • Webster K.
        • Dover M.S.
        Links between anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during lower third molar surgery.
        Br Dent J. 2002; 193: 43-45
        • Pogrel M.A.
        • Lee J.S.
        • Muff D.F.
        Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 1447-1452
        • Shepherd J.P.
        Lingual nerve retraction increases the risk of temporary lingual nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery.
        Evid Based Dent. 2006; 7: 47
        • Cheung L.K.
        • Leung Y.Y.
        • Chow L.K.
        • et al.
        Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 320-326
        • Janakiraman E.N.
        • Alexander M.
        • Sanjay P.
        Prospective analysis of frequency and contributing factors of nerve injuries following third-molar surgery.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 784-786
        • Leung Y.Y.
        • Cheung L.K.
        Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 1-10
        • Coulthard P.
        • Bailey E.
        • Esposito M.
        • et al.
        Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7CD004345
        • Bataineh A.B.
        • Batarseh R.A.
        The effect of modified surgical flap design for removal of lower third molars on lingual nerve injury.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 2091-2099
        • La Monaca G.
        • Vozza I.
        • Giardino R.
        • et al.
        Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.
        Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8: 45-52
        • Vaithilingam Y.
        • Balaji T.S.
        • Joseph N.J.
        • et al.
        A self-retaining lingual flap guarding device during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
        J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017; 16: 510-511
        • Gargallo-Albiol J.
        • Buenechea-Imaz R.
        • Gay-Escoda C.
        Lingual nerve protection during surgical removal of lower third molars: a prospective randomised study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 29: 268-271
        • Charan Babu H.S.
        • Reddy P.B.
        • Pattathan R.K.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing lingual nerve paraesthesia following third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study.
        J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 12: 168-172
        • Gibbons A.J.
        • Moss C.E.
        Lingual flap retraction in third molar surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 364