Comparison of intraoperative outcomes with single and double puncture techniques of arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint

      Abstract

      Evidence of differences in operator-related outcomes between single and double puncture arthrocentesis is limited. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare intraoperative outcomes with single puncture types 1 and 2, and double puncture, arthrocentesis. A total of 59 patients with 60 temporomandibular joints (TMJ) were treated sequentially by single puncture type 1 (n = 20), single puncture type 2 (n = 20), and double puncture arthrocentesis (n = 20). Total operating time, incidence of dislocation of the needle, preauricular swelling, and ease of operation were compared. Single puncture type 2 arthrocentesis took significantly less time than type 1 (p < 0.0001) or double puncture arthrocentesis (p < 0.0001), but there was no difference in operating time between single puncture type 1 and the double puncture technique (p = 0.25). There were significantly fewer dislocations of the needle with single puncture type 1 (p = 0.041) and single puncture type 2 (p = 0.033) than with double arthrocentesis. Single puncture type 2 arthrocentesis was easier than the single puncture type 1 (p = 0.001) or double puncture technique (p < 0.0001). Extravasation of fluid caused swelling in seven patients after double puncture, and in three patients each after single puncture types 1 and 2, arthrocentesis. Our results indicate that the single puncture type 2 technique is easiest and requires the least operating time. There was no difference between single puncture type 1 and double puncture arthrocentesis in terms of operating time or ease of the procedure. There were fewer operative dislocations of the needle with the single than with the double puncture technique.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nagori S.A.
        • Roy Chowdhury S.K.
        • Thukral H.
        • et al.
        Single puncture versus standard double needle arthrocentesis for the management of temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 810-818
        • Nitzan D.W.
        • Dolwick M.F.
        • Martinez G.A.
        Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49: 1163-1170
        • Guarda-Nardini L.
        • Manfredini D.
        • Ferronato G.
        Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a proposal for a single-needle technique.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106: 483-486
        • Şentürk M.F.
        • Cambazoğlu M.A.
        new classification for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis techniques.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 417-418
        • Rehman K.-U.
        • Hall T.
        Single needle arthrocentesis.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 47: 403-404
        • Alkan A.
        • Baş B.
        The use of double-needle cannula method for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: clinical report.
        Eur J Dent. 2007; 1: 179-182
        • Rahal A.
        • Poirier J.
        • Ahmarani C.
        Single-puncture arthrocentesis—introducing a new technique and a novel device.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 1771-1773
        • Öreroğlu A.R.
        • Özkaya Ö
        • Öztürk M.B.
        • et al.
        Concentric-needle cannula method for single-puncture arthrocentesis in temporomandibular joint disease: an inexpensive and feasible technique.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 2334-2338
        • Skármeta N.P.
        • Pesce M.C.
        • Espinoza-Mellado P.A.
        A single-puncture arthrocentesis technique, using a peripheral intravenous catheter.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 1123-1125
        • Nagori S.A.
        • Chattopadhyay P.K.
        • Pathey K.K.
        • et al.
        The double intravenous catheter technique for single-puncture arthrocentesis.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28 (e603–e5)
        • Bayramoğlu Z.
        • Tozoğlu S.
        Comparison of single- and double-puncture arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders: a six-month, prospective study.
        Cranio. 2019; 25: 1-6
        • Folle F.S.
        • Poluha R.L.
        • Setogutti E.T.
        • et al.
        Double puncture versus single puncture arthrocentesis for the management of unilateral temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction: A randomized controlled trial.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018; 46: 2003-2007
        • Şentürk M.F.
        • Tüzüner-Öncül A.M.
        • Cambazoʇlu M.
        Prospective short term comparison of outcomes after single or double puncture arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54: 26-29
        • Guarda-Nardini L.
        • Ferronato G.
        • Manfredini D.
        Two-needle vs. single-needle technique for TMJ arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid injections: a comparative trial over a six-month follow-up.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 506-513
        • Şentürk M.F.
        • Yazıcı T.
        • Fındık Y.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative comparison of single- and double-puncture techniques in temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47: 1060-1064
        • Wilkes C.H.
        Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Pathological variations.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989; 115: 469-477
        • Manfredini D.
        • Rancitelli D.
        • Ferronato G.
        • et al.
        Arthrocentesis with or without additional drugs in temporomandibular joint inflammatory-degenerative disease: comparison of six treatment protocols.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39: 245-251
        • Talaat W.
        • Ghoneim M.M.
        • Elsholkamy M.
        Single-needle arthrocentesis (Shepard cannula) vs. double-needle arthrocentesis for treating disc displacement without reduction.
        Cranio. 2016; 34: 296-302