Sir,
We found that the publication on “Testing recommendation for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients planned for surgery - continuing the service and “suppressing” the pandemic” is very interesting.
1
Al-Muharraqi noted that “The aforementioned recommendations may be expensive, but they can mitigate the risks to patients, staff, and public.- Al-Muharraqi M.A.
Testing recommendation for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients planned for surgery – continuing the service and ‘suppressing’ the pandemic.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]. pii: S0266-4356): 30164-30169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.014
1
” In fact, surgeons are at a high risk of contracting COVID-9 in clinical practice. The COVID-19 patient might be asymptomatic and COVID-19 transmission to surgeon is possible.- Al-Muharraqi M.A.
Testing recommendation for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients planned for surgery – continuing the service and ‘suppressing’ the pandemic.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]. pii: S0266-4356): 30164-30169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.014
2
The concept to apply preoperative testing for COVID-19 is interesting. It might help screen for asymptomatic COVID-19. Nevertheless, it has to recognise that the PCR test might have a false negative result. The detection rate of COVID-19 is different in different types of specimens.3
The quality of available diagnostic tests is also important.- Wu J.
- Liu J.
- Li S.
- Peng Z.
- Xiao Z.
- Wang X.
- Yan R.
- Luo J.
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])101673https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673
4
It is necessary to have a good quality control of the test for preoperative testing. Regardless of preoperative testing for COVID-19, universal precautions for all patients are necessary.- Wang X.
- Tan L.
- Wang X.
- Liu W.
- Lu Y.
- Cheng L.
- Sun Z.
Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]. pii: S1201-9712): 30235-30236https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023
Ethics statement/confirmation of patients’ permission
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
References
- Testing recommendation for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients planned for surgery – continuing the service and ‘suppressing’ the pandemic.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]. pii: S0266-4356): 30164-30169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.014
- Carpal fracture and COVID-19 infection: observation from Thailand.Indian J Orthop. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]): 1https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00112-8
- Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])101673https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673
- Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously.Int J Infect Dis. 2020; ([Epub ahead of print]. pii: S1201-9712): 30235-30236https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 28, 2020
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.