Abstract
In orbital floor reconstruction, the need for the orbital implant to reach the exact
position of the posteromedial ledge is essential, but owing to the complex anatomy
of the region, visualisation of the ledge may be difficult. Several morphometric studies,
both radiographic and cadaveric, have calculated a mean length from the orbital rim
to the ledge. However, those linear measurements are unreliable and possess a higher
margin of error for intraoperative guidance. This study attempts to triangulate the
position of the posterior ledge from three easily accessible and reproducible points
on the orbit and tries to provide a better guideline. A total of 50 patients (25 male
and 25 female) with no history of orbital trauma or orbital surgery were selected
randomly for this study. Computed tomography (CT) of both orbits, was done from three
anatomically consistent and reproducible points: the infraorbital rim just above the
infraorbital foramen (point A), hamulus lacrimalis (point B), and the most anterior
point of the inferior orbital fissure (point C). The distance from these landmarks
to the posterior ledge was measured using DICOM imaging software. A polygonal template
was fabricated using the data obtained, which was used for intraoperative guidance.
The mean (SD) distance to the posterior ledge from point A was 32.99 (1.35) mm, from
point B was 31.36 (1.31) mm, and from point C was 20.19 (1.40) mm. There were no significant
differences between left and right orbit or between male and female subjects. The
template guides the shape, size, and direction of the orbital implant, reducing the
risk of undersized or misplaced implants.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Finding the ledge: sagittal analysis of bony landmarks of the orbit.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75: 2613-2627
- How reliable is the visual appraisal of a surgeon for diagnosing orbital fractures?.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44: 1015-1024
- Surgical anatomy of fissures and foramina in the orbits of Thai adults.J Med Assoc Thai. 2007; 90: 2383-2391
- Surgical anatomy of the Chinese orbit.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 24: 136-141
- Morphometric analysis of the orbit in adult Egyptian skulls and its surgical relevance.Eur J Anat. 2014; 18: 303-315
- Orbital osteology: a study of the surgical landmarks.Laryngoscope. 1995; 105: 783-788
- Anatomical analysis of intraorbital structures regarding sinus surgery using multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography scans.Clin Exper Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 6: 23-29
- A morphometric study of the inferior orbital fissure using three-dimensional anatomical landmarks: application to orbital surgery.Clin Anat. 2009; 22: 649-654
- Reconstruction of orbital wall defects: critical review of 72 patients.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 193-199
- Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study, part III: Implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 2050-2056
- Post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: anatomical landmarks and the concept of the deep orbit.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 45: 183-189
Article info
Publication history
Published online: August 12, 2020
Accepted:
July 13,
2020
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.