Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 58, ISSUE 9, e104-e108, November 2020

Download started.

Ok

Triangulating the ledge: radiographic study of the floor of orbit and derivation of a novel template

  • N. Praveen Ganesh
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Permanent Address: Dr Pushan Maity, Purbachal, PO Dankuni, Dist Hooghly, West Bengal, India, PIN – 712311.
    Pushan Maity
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, PO Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai PIN – 602105, India.
    Footnotes
    1 Permanent Address: Dr Pushan Maity, Purbachal, PO Dankuni, Dist Hooghly, West Bengal, India, PIN – 712311.
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • D. Alagar Raja
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • R.V.M. Surya Rao
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • S. Narayanamurthy
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • A. Prasath
    Affiliations
    Dept of Plastic, Reconstructive and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Permanent Address: Dr Pushan Maity, Purbachal, PO Dankuni, Dist Hooghly, West Bengal, India, PIN – 712311.
Published:August 12, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.07.016

      Abstract

      In orbital floor reconstruction, the need for the orbital implant to reach the exact position of the posteromedial ledge is essential, but owing to the complex anatomy of the region, visualisation of the ledge may be difficult. Several morphometric studies, both radiographic and cadaveric, have calculated a mean length from the orbital rim to the ledge. However, those linear measurements are unreliable and possess a higher margin of error for intraoperative guidance. This study attempts to triangulate the position of the posterior ledge from three easily accessible and reproducible points on the orbit and tries to provide a better guideline. A total of 50 patients (25 male and 25 female) with no history of orbital trauma or orbital surgery were selected randomly for this study. Computed tomography (CT) of both orbits, was done from three anatomically consistent and reproducible points: the infraorbital rim just above the infraorbital foramen (point A), hamulus lacrimalis (point B), and the most anterior point of the inferior orbital fissure (point C). The distance from these landmarks to the posterior ledge was measured using DICOM imaging software. A polygonal template was fabricated using the data obtained, which was used for intraoperative guidance. The mean (SD) distance to the posterior ledge from point A was 32.99 (1.35) mm, from point B was 31.36 (1.31) mm, and from point C was 20.19 (1.40) mm. There were no significant differences between left and right orbit or between male and female subjects. The template guides the shape, size, and direction of the orbital implant, reducing the risk of undersized or misplaced implants.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gooris P.J.
        • Muller B.S.
        • Dubois L.
        • et al.
        Finding the ledge: sagittal analysis of bony landmarks of the orbit.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75: 2613-2627
        • Dubois L.
        • Jansen J.
        • Schreurs R.
        • et al.
        How reliable is the visual appraisal of a surgeon for diagnosing orbital fractures?.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44: 1015-1024
        • Huanmanop T.
        • Agthong S.
        • Chentanez V.
        Surgical anatomy of fissures and foramina in the orbits of Thai adults.
        J Med Assoc Thai. 2007; 90: 2383-2391
        • Cheng A.C.
        • Lucas P.W.
        • Yuen H.K.
        • et al.
        Surgical anatomy of the Chinese orbit.
        Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 24: 136-141
        • Fetouh F.A.
        • Mandour D.
        Morphometric analysis of the orbit in adult Egyptian skulls and its surgical relevance.
        Eur J Anat. 2014; 18: 303-315
        • McQueen C.T.
        • DiRuggiero D.C.
        • Campbell J.P.
        • et al.
        Orbital osteology: a study of the surgical landmarks.
        Laryngoscope. 1995; 105: 783-788
        • Hwang S.H.
        • Park C.S.
        • Cho J.H.
        • et al.
        Anatomical analysis of intraorbital structures regarding sinus surgery using multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography scans.
        Clin Exper Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 6: 23-29
        • Ozer M.A.
        • Celik S.
        • Govsa F.
        A morphometric study of the inferior orbital fissure using three-dimensional anatomical landmarks: application to orbital surgery.
        Clin Anat. 2009; 22: 649-654
        • Jaquiéry C.
        • Aeppli C.
        • Cornelius P.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction of orbital wall defects: critical review of 72 patients.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 193-199
        • Dubois L.
        • Essig H.
        • Schreurs R.
        • et al.
        Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study, part III: Implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 2050-2056
        • Evans B.
        • Webb A.
        Post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: anatomical landmarks and the concept of the deep orbit.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 45: 183-189