Introduction: Consent issues are a major factor in litigation. Shortfalls often make defence of
a claim difficult. Arguably this has been made more difficult with the relatively
recent Montgomery ruling. Unfortunately current guidelines are subject to personal
interpretation and application (i.e. what do we define as a “serious” complication
and how common is “common”). Thus consenting for procedures can be problematic. Whilst
a surgeon's perspective of relevant risks is important, the significance and likelihood
of complications may be viewed differently by patients. We aimed to identify those
risks patients may consider to be relevant and which should be routinely discussed.
This study was undertaken for five common procedures.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
