Advertisement

Mathematical analysis of fracture configuration in predicting outcome in complex anterior skull base trauma

Published:November 16, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.11.005

      Abstract

      Craniofacial trauma involving the anterior skull base produces a heterogenous injury with variance in fracture pattern, complexity and outcome. Variance is influenced by the biomechanical properties of the craniofacial construct and by the magnitude and vector of the impacting energy. Fractal dimension and other metrics applied to individual fracture patterns allows quantification of fracture complexity and severity, which can be used to correlate with neurological outcome. Frontobasal fractures from 81 patients admitted to two UK major trauma centres were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with anteriorly-based vectors of impact and those with laterally-based vectors. Osseous disruption was quantified by: fractal dimension, fracture length, number of termini, and number of nodes, and then compared with neurological outcome using first recorded Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and requirement for intubation. As fracture length increased, fractures from anterior impacts became more complex and reticulated compared with lateral impacts; fractal dimension also increased more rapidly for anterior impacts. Longer fracture length in both groups was associated with a significantly lower GCS, and increased requirement for intubation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Fracture propagation and severity of head injury was different in anterior-directed trauma compared to lateral-directed trauma. Consequently, we suggest that the central region of the anterior skull base acts to primarily absorb impact force thereby behaving as a protective ‘ crumple zone ’ . In severe mechanisms the protective mechanism is exceeded and the fracture length tended to that of the lateral group worsening prognosis.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Stephens J.R.
        • Holmes S.
        • Evans B.T.
        Applied anatomy of the anterior cranial fossa: what can fracture patterns tell us?.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 275-278
        • Manson P.N.
        • Stanwix M.G.
        • Yaremchuk M.J.
        • Nam A.J.
        • Hui-Chou H.
        • Rodriguez E.D.
        Frontobasal fractures: anatomical classification and clinical significance.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 2096-2106
      1. Hardt J KJ. Mechanisms of Craniofacial Trauma in Craniofacial Trauma.55-61.

        • Sreedharan S.
        • Veeramuthu V.
        • Hariri F.
        • Hamzah N.
        • Ramli N.
        • Narayanan V.
        Cerebral white matter microstructural changes in isolated maxillofacial trauma and associated neuropsychological outcomes.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49: 1183-1192
        • Stephens J.R.
        • Holmes S.
        • Bulters D.
        • Evans B.T.
        The effect of direction of force to the craniofacial skeleton on the severity of brain injury in patients with a fronto-basal fracture.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 872-877
        • Ochalski P.G.
        • Spiro R.M.
        • Fabio A.
        • Kassam A.B.
        • Okonkwo D.O.
        Fractures of the clivus: a contemporary series in the computed tomography era.
        Neurosurgery. 2009; 65 (discussion 9): 1063-1069
        • Derdyn C.P.J.
        • Broaddus W.C.
        • Delashaw J.B.
        • Jane J.
        • Levine P.A.
        • Torner J.
        Craniofacial Trauma An Assessment of Risk Related to Timing of Surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 86: 238-245
        • Yoganandan N.
        • Pintar F.A.
        Biomechanics of temporo-parietal skull fracture.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19: 225-239
        • Huempfner-Hierl H.
        • Bohne A.
        • Wollny G.
        • Sterker I.
        • Hierl T.
        Blunt forehead trauma and optic canal involvement: finite element analysis of anterior skull base and orbit on causes of vision impairment.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99: 1430-1434
        • Buitrago-Tellez C.S.W.
        • Bohnert M.
        • Alt K.
        • Kimmig M.
        A comprehensive classification of craniofacial fractures: postmortem and clinical studies with two and three dimensional computed tomography.
        Int J Care Injured. 2002; : 651-688
        • Le Comber S.C.
        • Spinks A.C.
        • Bennett N.C.
        • Jarvis J.U.M.
        • Faulkes C.G.
        Fractal dimension of African mole-rat burrows.
        Can j Zool. 2002; 80: 436-441
        • Gerbino G.
        • Roccia F.
        • Benech A.
        • Caldarelli C.
        Analysis of 158 frontal sinus fractures: current surgical management and complications.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000; 28: 133-139
        • Johnson N.R.
        • Roberts M.J.
        Frontal sinus fracture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;
        • Lee K.F.W.L.
        • Lee Y.E.
        • Suh J.H.
        • Lee S.R.
        The impact-absorbing effects of facial fractures in closed-head injuries.
        J Neurosurg. 1987; 66: 542-547
        • Lee T.S.
        • Kellman R.
        • Darling A.
        Crumple zone effect of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses on posterior cranial fossa.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 2241-2246
        • Gennarelli T.A.C.H.
        • Copes W.S.
        • Sacco W.J.
        Comparison of mortality, morbidity, and severity og 59,713 head injured patients with 114,447 patients with extracranial injuries.
        Journal of Trauma. 1994; 37: 962-968
        • Narayan R.K.G.R.
        • Miller J.D.
        • Enas G.G.
        • Choi S.C.
        • Kishore P.R.
        • Selhorst J.B.
        • Lutz H.A.
        • Becker D.P.
        Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury.
        Journal of Neurosurgery. journal of Neurosurgery. 1981; 54: 751-762