Advertisement

Effectiveness of rhBMP-2 versus iliac autogenous bone graft in reconstructive surgery of cleft patients: an umbrella review

Published:December 09, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.001

      Abstract

      The objective of this umbrella review was to determine the effectiveness of rhBMP-2 in the reconstructive surgery of cleft patients through an evaluation of bone filling and volume of newly formed bone in the cleft area. A systematic search was carried out in PubMed/ Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) via Open Grey, until June 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. A total of 2739 articles were identified and, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, six were included for final evaluation. The bone filling rate was 74.23% in the rhBMP-2 group and 72.38% in the autogenous group. Regarding the risk of bias, none of the articles had a low risk, four had an uncertain risk, and two a high risk. The results of this umbrella review show that the studies had high and uncertain risks of bias, and high heterogeneity. There was a lack of evidence regarding the possible complications offered by this therapy. The recommendation to use BMP-2 for alveolar cleft reconstruction, especially in a paediatric population, should be viewed with caution. New primary studies are needed to assess this variable and safely determine the use of rhBMP-2 in reconstructive surgery for cleft patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Seifeldin A.S.
        Is alveolar cleft reconstruction still controversial? (Review of literature).
        Saudi Dent J. 2016; 28: 3-11
        • Wu C.
        • Pan W.
        • Feng C.
        • et al.
        Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47: 345-356
        • Sales P.H.
        • Oliveira-Neto O.B.
        • Torres T.S.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of dental implants placed in bone graft area of cleft patients.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48: 1109-1114
        • Alberktsson T.
        • Johansson C.
        Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration.
        Eur Spine J. 2001; 10: S96-S101
        • Wheeler J.
        • Sanders M.
        • Loo S.
        • et al.
        Iliac crest donor site for children with cleft lip and palate undergoing alveolar bone grafting: a long-term assessment.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27: 598-601
        • Amin K.
        • Khor W.S.
        • Rosich-Medina A.
        • et al.
        Alveolar bone grafting: donor site review of 100 consecutive cases in cleft lip and palate.
        Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017; 54: 137-141
        • Bezerra B.T.
        • Pinho J.N.
        • Figueiredo F.E.
        • et al.
        Autogenous bone graft versus bovine bone graft in association with platelet-rich plasma for the reconstruction of alveolar clefts: a pilot study.
        Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019; 56: 134-140
        • Alonso N.
        • Tanikawa D.Y.
        • Freitas R. da S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of maxillary alveolar reconstruction using resorbable collagen sponge with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in cleft lip and palate patients.
        Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010; 16: 1183-1189
        • Canan Jr, L.W.
        • da Silva F.R.
        • Alonso N.
        • et al.
        Human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use for maxillary reconstruction in cleft lip and palate patients.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23: 1627-1633
        • Liang F.
        • Yen S.L.
        • Imahiyerobo T.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography volumetric outcomes of rhBMP-2/ demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 767-774
        • Hammoudeh J.A.
        • Fahradyan A.
        • Gould D.J.
        • et al.
        A comparative analysis of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with a demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for secondary alveolar bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate: review of 501 cases.
        Plast Reconst Surg. 2017; 140: 318e-325e
        • Reddi A.H.
        Bone and cartilage differention.
        Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994; 4: 737-744
        • Israel D.I.
        • Nove J.
        • Kerns K.M.
        • et al.
        Expression and characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
        Growth Factors. 1992; 7: 139-150
        • Sales P.H.
        • Leão J.C.
        Why perform overviews and umbrella reviews in oral and maxillofacial surgery?.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59: 132-133
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Telzlaff J.
        • et al.
        PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
        • Whiting P.
        • Savović J.
        • Higgins J.P.
        • et al.
        ROBIS Group. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69: 225-234
        • Kamal M.
        • Ziyab A.H.
        • Bartella A.
        • et al.
        Volumetric comparison of autogenous bone and tissue-engineered bone replacement materials in alveolar cleft repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 56: 453-462
        • Scalzone A.
        • Flores-Mir C.
        • Carozza D.
        • et al.
        Secondary alveolar bone grafting using autologous versus alloplastic material in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Prog Orthod. 2019; 20: 6
        • da Rosa W.L.
        • da Silva T.M.
        • Galarça A.D.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of rhBMP-2 in cleft lip and palate defects: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Calcif Tissue Int. 2019; 104: 115-129
        • Uribe F.
        • Alister J.P.
        • Zaror C.
        • et al.
        Alveolar cleft reconstruction using morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020; 57: 589-598
        • Xiao W.L.
        • Jia K.N.
        • Yu G.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and iliac cancellous bone transplantation on alveolar cleft bone grafting: a meta-analysis.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73: 1135-1142
        • Herford A.S.
        • Boyne P.J.
        • Rawson R.
        • et al.
        Bone morphogentic protein-induced repair of the premaxillary cleft.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 2136-2141
        • Balaji S.M.
        Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) in reconstruction of maxillary alveolar clefts.
        J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009; 8: 211-217
        • Dickinson B.P.
        • Ashley R.K.
        • Wasson K.L.
        • et al.
        Reduced morbidity and improved healing with bone morphogenetic protein-2 in older patients with alveolar cleft defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 209-217
        • Neovius E.
        • Lemberger M.
        • Docherty-Skogh A.C.
        • et al.
        Alveolar bone healing accompanied by severe swelling in cleft children treated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivered by hydrogel.
        Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013; 66: 37-42
        • Francis C.S.
        • Mobin S.S.
        • Lypka M.A.
        • et al.
        rhBMP-2 with a demineralized bone matrix scaffold versus autologous iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 1107-1115
        • She X.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Tian K.
        • et al.
        Clinical research on repairing alveolar cleft with osteoinduction active materials.
        Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010; 28 (In Chinese): 391-394
        • Wang S.M.
        • Sun Y.
        Application of bone morphogenetic protein-2 combined with granulo-β-tricalcium phosphate in alveolar cleft reconstruction.
        J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2011; 15 (In Chinese (English abstract)): 9687-9690https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.51.045
        • Alonso N.
        • Risso G.H.
        • Denadai R.
        • et al.
        Effect of maxillary alveolar reconstruction on nasal symmetry of cleft lip and palate patients: a study comparing iliac crest bone graft and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67: 1201-1208
        • Brudnicki A.
        • Rachwalski M.
        • Wiepszowski L.
        • et al.
        Secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate: a comparative analysis of donor site morbidity in different age groups.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 165-169
        • Al Harbi H.
        • Al Y.A.
        Long-term follow-up of tibial bone graft for correction of alveolar cleft.
        Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 2: 146-152
        • Andersen K.
        • Nørholt S.E.
        • Knudsen J.
        • et al.
        Donor site morbity after reconstruction of alveolar bone defects with mandibular symphyseal bone grafts in cleft patients - 111 consecutive patients.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 428-432
        • Da Hora Sales P.H.
        • Teixeira Pinho Filho J.E.
        • Cetira Filho E.L.
        • et al.
        Mandibular symphysis bone graft for alveolar reconstruction in cleft patients: an alternative technique with a particular surgical drill.
        Minerva Stomatol. 2019; 68: 273-274
        • Janssen N.G.
        • Weijs W.L.
        • Koole R.
        • et al.
        Tissue engineering strategies for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18: 219-226
        • Liang F.
        • Leland H.
        • Jedrzejewski B.
        • et al.
        Alternatives to autologous bone graft in alveolar cleft reconstruction: the state of alveolar tissue engineering.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29: 584-593
        • Woo E.J.
        Adverse events reported after the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 765-767
        • Fisher M.
        • Yee K.
        • Alba B.
        • et al.
        Applications of bone morphogenetic protein-2: alternative therapies in craniofacial reconstruction.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30: 1952-1959
        • Burkus J.K.
        • Dorchak J.D.
        • Sanders D.L.
        Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2.
        Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28: 372-377
        • Kamal M.
        • Gremse F.
        • Rosenhain S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of bone grafts from various donor sites in human bone specimens.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29: 1661-1665