Abstract
Fracture of the nasal bone is the most common facial fracture because the nose is
the most protruding part of the facial skeleton. Standard treatment is nasal reduction,
which may cause patients significant pain and stress. Closed nasal reduction may be
unsuccessful because of old fractures, despite physical examination being compatible
with a new fracture. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the success
of closed nasal reduction. A total of 80 patients with isolated nasal bone fractures
who opted for closed reduction under local anaesthesia were included. Demographic
features, days from trauma, and findings of physical examination and lateral nasal
X-rays were assessed. Significant nasal bone movement with significant improvement
in the deformity was considered a successful reduction. An absence of, or minimal,
nasal bone movement was considered unsuccessful. The mean (SD) age of the patients
was 28.4 (11.5) the youngest being 15. A total of 56 patients had successful nasal
reduction. Younger age (p = 0.021), absence of periorbital ecchymosis (p = 0.042),
and no fracture line on lateral nasal X-ray (p = 0.000), were associated with unsuccessful
reduction. Although lateral nasal X-ray is not considered a good instrument for diagnosis
of a nasal fracture, this study has shown that the absence of a fracture line on a
lateral nasal X-ray can be a predictor for unsuccessful reduction in patients older
than 15 years.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Patients with nasal fracture.J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31: e275-e277
- A retrospective analysis of facial fracture etiologies.Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 398-403
- Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients.Laryngoscope. 2003; 113: 102-106
- Epidemiology of facial fractures: incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study.Inj Prev. 2020; 26: i27-i35
- Cummings otolaryngology: head and neck surgery e-book.6th ed. Saunders, 2014
- The effect of periorbital cooling on pain, edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study.Rhinology. 2016; 54: 32-37
- Open vs closed approach to the nasal pyramid for fracture reduction.Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007; 9: 82-86
- Precisely closed reduction of nasal bone fracture assisted with plain film measurements under the picture archiving and communication system.Ear Nose Throat J. 2021; (1455613211012111. Epub ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211012111
- Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients.J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17: 261-264
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: March 17, 2022
Accepted:
March 15,
2022
Received:
February 19,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2022 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.