An unfavourable split is a well-known complication following a sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. Our aim was to analyse all unfavourable mandibular splits that had occurred when carrying out a SSO with the aim to design a classification which can facilitate management. We carried out a retrospective study analysing all orthognathic surgery from January 2010 until April 2021. Data surrounding unfavourable splits during this period were specifically analysed. Orthognathic surgery during this period was performed by a single OMFS unit with osteotomies performed by a single surgeon and their trainee. The dataset included 311 patients who underwent either a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or a bimaxillary osteotomy. There were 225 bimaxillary osteotomies and 86 BSSOs. Twenty-one patients had unfavourable splits following their BSSO with a total of 22 out of 622 sagittal split osteotomies over this 11-year period. Bilateral unfavourable splits occurred in one patient. These results correlate to an incidence rate of 6.8% of unfavourable splits following SSO's in an 11-year period. The results reveal common patterns of unfavourable splits to suggest a simple classification based on our results. This can be applied to any unfavourable splits in SSO which then allows the clinician to proceed with surgery and prevent abandonment of the procedure. It is classified as follows: Type 1 fractures where the mandibular condyle is attached to the proximal fragment; Type 2 fractures whereby the mandibular condyle is attached to the tooth-bearing segment; Type 3 fractures are lingual cortex fractures. Each of these fracture types has a specific management protocol, which we recommend is used in all unfavourable splits.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Three-dimensional fracture pattern analysis of the Obwegeser and Dal Pont bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 1452-1458
- Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of reported risk factors.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 971-979
- On the surgical technique for progeny and other mandibular anomalies.Dtsch Z Mund Kieferheilk. 1955; 23 (paper in German): 1-26
- Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: a letter to the next generations of surgeons.Clin Plast Surg. 2007; 34: 331-335
- Retromolar osteotomy for progeny correction.Minerva Chir. 1959; 18 (paper in Italian): 1138-1141
- A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism.J Oral Surg. 1968; 26: 250-253
- Functional and radiographic long-term results after bad split in orthognathic surgery.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37: 606-611
- Further refinement and evaluation of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 45: 684-688
- Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy procedure and technique.Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 24: 37-43
- A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 2125-2130
Published online: November 11, 2022
Accepted: November 6, 2022
© 2022 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.