Abstract
Orbital fractures can result in devastating functional complications to sight and
well-being, yet our understanding of functional sequelae post reconstruction is not
well understood in the literature. This research retrospectively analysed the activity
of a specialist orbital surgeon over five years to evaluate the incidence of, and
risk factors for, debilitating complications such as diplopia and restriction of extraocular
movement. Orbital fracture cases repaired between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019
were retrospectively analysed. Demographics, orthoptic assessment, injury classification,
timing, operative details, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Preoperative
and postoperative binocular single vision scores (BSV) were recorded to calculate
the effect of orbital repair on residual diplopia. Of 582 patients undergoing orbital
access, 472 cases of orbital wall reconstruction satisfied the inclusion criteria,
of which 162 (34%) were Jaquiéry 4 or 5. Overall, 10.6% had complications, 4.9% had
diplopia, and 5.7% were returned to theatre. All those with residual diplopia had
had it preoperatively, and had evidence of an improvement in BSV score. Time to surgery,
material, and pure orbital fractures had a significant impact on the incidence of
diplopia. Defect size did not. Whilst complication rates were low we conclude that
strict adherence to a defined surgical protocol, postoperative imaging, and objective
assessment of postoperative function are central to maintaining these standards. Objective
orthoptic analysis of patients before and after orbital repair is critical to our
understanding of this pathology. Whilst preoperative prediction of the persistence
of long-term diplopia currently eludes us, further research should target it.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Going beyond the limitations of the non-patient-specific implant in titanium reconstruction of the orbit.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59: 1074-1078
- Orbital volume measurements in enophthalmos using three-dimensional CT imaging.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 75: 502-508
- Clinical recommendations for repair of isolated orbital floor fractures: an evidence-based analysis.Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1207-1213
- Diplopia and orbital wall fractures.J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25: e183-e185
- Proposal of success criteria for strabismus surgery in patients with Graves' orbitopathy based on a systematic literature review.Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93: 601-609
- Diplopia and ocular motility in orbital blow-out fractures: 10-year retrospective study.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 1010-1106
- A nonsurgical approach with repeated orthoptic evaluation is justified for most blow-out fractures.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48: 560-568
- A functional scoring method for the field of binocular single vision.Ophthalmology. 1992; 99: 575-581
- Reconstruction of orbital wall defects: critical review of 72 patients.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 193-199
- Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003; 31: 51-61
- Epidemiology of maxillofacial injuries at trauma hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 1997.J Trauma. 2000; 49: 425-432
- European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: a multicentre and prospective study.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 62-70
- Comparing urban maxillofacial trauma patterns to the National Trauma Data Bank.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020; 129: 149-156
- Epidemiologic patterns of maxillofacial trauma in a metropolitan area: a retrospective analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 79: e1-e10
- Is the pure and impure distinction of orbital fractures clinically relevant with respect to ocular and periocular injuries? A retrospective study of 473 patients.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 1935-1942
- Analysis of complications after surgical repair of orbital fractures.J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 1387-1390
- Influence of the volume of soft tissue herniation on clinical symptoms of patients with orbital floor fractures.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44: 1929-1934
- Controversies in orbital reconstruction–II. Timing of post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 433-440
- Surgical timing of the orbital “blowout” fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 155: 387-390
- Does early repair of orbital fractures result in superior patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 78: e15-e16
- Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study. Part III: implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 2050-2056
- Predictability in orbital reconstruction: a human cadaver study. Part I: endoscopic-assisted orbital reconstruction.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 2034-2041
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 31, 2023
Accepted:
January 24,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2023 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.